Aug/110
Runner Seeks Same with Strong Horse
To compete in the Ride & Tie World Championships, held in Humboldt in June, takes wealth or a little match-making luck. To win, well … try finishing!
By Gordon Wright
If you want to get into Ride & Tie – the hardest, most deliriously fun sport you’ve never heard of – here’s the best way.
First, become fabulously wealthy. Buy a big spread out in the country with plenty of outbuildings and pastureland. Then, buy a horse or two with strong Arabian bloodlines and take several years of riding lessons.
Finally, ramp up your trail running mileage to that of an ultrarunner, find another person who is equally wealthy and fit and, well, now you’re set – perfectly positioned to enter the Ride & Tie World Championships.
Does that sound like a high barrier to entry?
You can, instead, do it the way I’ve done it two of the past three years: go on Rideandtie.org and sign up on their online listing matching people with horses with people looking for people with horses.
It’s a necessary online dating scheme for this two-person sport, and if you’re lucky, like me, you’ll get a call from an anesthesiologist from Kentucky who looks (and sounds) just like Tommy Lee Jones.
My anesthesiologist friend is named Leslie Yates, and with his help, I was introduced to Ride & Tie in 2009, when we first competed in the World Championships.
Luckily, I had years of childhood riding that I could dust off in my muscle memory and that was enough for me to try my hand at a sport that, while founded in 1971, remains resolutely under the radar.
Ride & Tie (you’ll have to trust me here – there’s no Wikipedia entry for the sport) got its start in the frontier West, where families and communities often had more people than they did horses.
It turns out that the most efficient means of getting two people and one horse over a lot of ground isn’t riding tandem, but rather having the horse and one rider gallop off into the distance, tie the horse to a tree and start running. The trailing runner comes upon the horse, unties it and sets off in pursuit, ultimately passing the first rider.
Hop-scotching this way means that even the most demanding, 35-mile trail courses – such as the 41st annual Ride & Tie World Championships – can be smoked in about five hours.
Unless you’re a middling ultra-runner and a 62-year-old anesthesiologist from Kentucky.
When Leslie Yates and I competed in the 2009 World Championships, we wrestled a willful but speedy mare named Nastasha over 34 miles to finish in a credible time of 6:27 – even winning a prize purse for a podium finish in the Men’s Division. This year? Well, this year was different.
With his meticulous nature, Yates is a natural at plotting strategy for a race that demands it. There are plenty of subtleties to Ride & Tie: when to tie, where to tie, how often to tie. How to exploit your stronger runner. How to carry enough hydration to stoke the runners and how to find water for the horse. How to manage the horse’s exertion levels so that it passes two mandatory veterinarian checkpoints.
I left all that in Yates’ capable hands. Being a newcomer to the sport, I knew only enough to get out of his way, and to do what he suggested. But our strategy held a Grecian hamartia this year – a fatal flaw, based in hubris – that would spell our near downfall. See, while I’m a fairly strong runner, especially by Ride & Tie standards, Yates tragically over-calculated my abilities, leading to a very, very long day at the race venue in Humboldt Redwoods State Park on June 18th.
To begin the 35-mile course, Yates’ plan had me running much of the first 11-mile loop by myself. He would push our horse, Kayla, up the first long ascent and first descent, making our first tie nearly five miles into the race.
So, as our competitors worked together jumping on and off the horse at short, furious intervals, I was slogging up and down a forested peak, increasingly alone with the realization that I was near the back of the pack. After passing three runners and two horses on the downhill, I found our horse and shortly afterward, found Yates not far ahead.
Another part of Yates’ strategy, aside from the anomalous start, was to practice what’s known as “short ties,” where we were to stay close together and tie the horse to a tree at handy intervals.
This wound up working well for the two of us, though I rode very little and ran very much. Over the next loop of 11 miles, we traded off frequently as the temperatures rose and Kayla worked laboriously to haul us through the towering oaks and redwoods.
It was only on the third loop where it all fell apart; where we not only lost touch with the rest of the pack, but I also, in a small way, lost my mind.
The final 13-mile loop began with a punishing ascent of nearly 2,000 feet, during which we worked efficiently, though slowly. As befitting a 62-year-old, Yates was fairly serene in his running. In fact, when off the horse, his default pace was best described as a mosey.
This gentility was equally apparent when he rode Kayla – rarely did the two of them get past a stately trot. All of which would be fine, had I been an elite runner; since I was not, what it meant was that my mileage for the day was approaching the total mileage I’d been logging monthly in training.
By the end of the ascent, I was about cooked. At mile 27, we completed one last hand-off as I passed Yates, tossed a “see you soon!” over my shoulder and, a quarter mile later, tied Kayla to a tree and took off running.
I never saw Yates again until the finish line, where I lay sprawled in a chair with worried co-competitors scrambling around, forcing fluids down me while I tried not to vomit.
The eight miles after my last tie should have been the easiest: a gentle three-mile ridge traverse, followed by a five-mile descent into the finish. For the first mile I ran strong. The second mile, my gait faltered as I wondered where Yates was. The third mile involved high-decibel internal lectures that I would deliver to my teammate while I slowed to a shuffle.
By the start of the fourth mile, self-pity had shouted down anger, and I finally ground to a halt and sat down in a beautiful meadow before the descent. Then I laid down in that beautiful meadow before the descent. I may have napped, I’m not sure, but I was damn certain I wasn’t going to go a step further until Yates came around on the laggard Kayla, especially because the horse was – quite literally – carrying my water.
That plan didn’t last long, as I was significantly dehydrated, and I knew that five short downhill miles were all that separated me from ice-cold Gatorade. Plus, I reckoned as I groaned my way to my feet, what if Kayla had broken an ankle? Someone would have to get down to civilization to report the bad news. I trotted onward, cotton-mouthed and aching.
I wobbled through the last bit of the race in a woeful 51 minutes, mincing through the stream-laden descent and musing on the trade-off between giardia and kidney failure.
Seven minutes after I reached the finish area, and after I had regained some of my composure (and electrolytes) thanks to my competitors, a remorseful Yates came strolling into view atop Kayla.
“I’m sorry man,” he said as he dismounted. “She was tired, and I just didn’t think I could push her.”
I felt a shift in my mood. Yes, I had killed myself, but hey: I had outrun a horse.
Stifling an urge to point out that I was a bit tuckered as well, I gripped Yates in a cowboy hug, and we crossed the finish line for an official time of eight hours and ten minutes. It was nearly an hour and a half longer than it took me to run my last 50K.
Ride & Tie is as full of challenges as it is full of fun. As the organization’s website says, “Finishing a Ride & Tie is humbling and gratifying. To finish is to win.”
Indeed, some of the pre-race favorites either didn’t finish or were disqualified because their horse had been ridden too hard. Kayla, for her part, looked remarkably spry at the finish, even as I drove exhausted from the race home to Marin County.
Our finish was a win, in my book, and despite the wreckage I’d put on myself, I’ll be back to Ride & Tie.
Gordon Wright is head honcho of Outside PR & Sports Marketing in San Francisco. He’s assured his wife that he won’t be coming home with a horse anytime soon.
Nov/100
The Family That Tris Together
Father-son showdown turns into a transformative event — and a springboard to stardom
By Gordon Wright
At what point will you get your butt kicked by your own child?
I suppose it’s different for every active family, though my father offered little in the way of benchmarking. He was an egghead — a myopic lawyer with Mr. Magoo coordination; a man who considered a vigorous martini shaking to be a good workout. By the time I was 12, I couldn’t play catch with him for fear of bouncing a fastball off his chronically distracted dome.
But like Death and Taxes, the Intergenerational Beat Down is a certainty, even for the most competitive and active parent. As I wrote about in the last issue of ASJ, my day was nigh: more than a year ago, it became painfully apparent that my 15-year-old son Will was by far the strongest mountain biker in the family.
There’s no shame in that – in the spring of 2010 he was ranked among the top 20 high school freshmen in the state in mountain bike racing. He also plays water polo for his high school, thus moving me down the family podium in swimming as well.
But as a doting father, I felt that Will needed a graduate-level introduction to multisport racing and that maybe my stronger running would level the playing field. I knew he’d be good at triathlon, and it would be nice to see him kick someone else’s butt for a change. Plus, as a sweet kid whose chronic niceness sometimes got in the way of his own athletic success, he’d gain some serious competitive confidence if he did well.
Thus: triathlon. Especially, off-road triathlon. Specifically, Scott Tinley’s Extreme Offroad race on October 3rd, which is about as hard a short race as you can find on the West Coast. We had come to the race not only to compete against each other and test the current limits of father and son fitness, but to see if Will’s catholic taste in sports could all be summoned into one shining example of confidence-boosting excellence.
“But what if he doesn’t do well? What if you manage to catch him? What are you going to do, pass him?”
These questions were lofted by my wife as I packed up to head south toward San Luis Obispo. In a typically male example of emotional cluelessness, I dismissed her concerns, blithely putting my son’s sporting confidence up for grabs, in a sport in which he’d never competed.
We got to San Luis the afternoon before the race, picking up our race schwag before wedging in a nice surf session at Pismo Beach. A fitful night of homework and sleep in a local motel led to an early wakeup call that got us to the race site at Lopez Lake with just enough time to spare to prep our transitions, get a little food in us and suit up. For someone who had absolutely no idea what he was getting into, Will looked completely composed — informed, no doubt, by the thousands and thousands of yards he’d put in at early-morning pool workouts.
Terry Davis, the Tri California impresario who runs such benchmark events as the Escape from Alcatraz and Wildflower, gave a short convocation before sending the roughly 50 athletes off into Lake Lopez.
I knew I’d be in trouble on the swim. Will’s water polo team is one of the best in Northern California and his typical training day in the weeks leading up to our tri looked something like this:
First workout, 6:30am – 7:45am:
- 15 x 100m freestyle on the 1:30s
- Ball handling skills
- Cool down 400m
Second workout, 3:15pm – 5:30pm:
- Warm-up 500m
- One hour scrimmaging
- 45 minutes, drills
My swim training looked something like this:
- June: Swim 900m, surf 6x
- July: Lose goggles, surf 5x
- August: Buy new goggles, swim 1200m
- September: Surf 8x, try to swim 800m without stopping
By the first buoy, Will had pulled away as I intermittently gasped for breath, swam into other racers, and tried not to drown. Will – in a four-millimeter surf wetsuit – shot out of the water after the half-mile swim with the 9th fastest time, while I foundered in like a carp in 25th.
My secret plan was to obliterate his faster swimming by blitzing through the transition while my son, whose feet grow a size seemingly every month, struggled to put on his bike shoes.
It worked. He left the transition area seconds before I did, and I managed to keep him in sight for all of a mile before his superior fitness and strength-to-weight ratio left me with a stark realization: I wasn’t going to be anywhere near him on the bike.
As Will and a cluster of stronger riders pulled away, I resigned myself to slogging through the rest of the 17-mile leg. The Extreme course hugged Lake Lopez and featured mile after mile of singletrack, which would have been delightful but for the fact that I walked many of the uphills.
I got passed on the uphills by at least five or six guys – which I didn’t mind much. I got passed twice on the downhill – which I did. I’d like to think it was the surf session the day prior, but the wretched ache in my legs was simply the result of being older, slower, and closer to death.
I knew I’d likely be faster the Will on the run: I do a fair amount of it, while Will logged exactly zero training runs (and had only once in his life run as far as the six miles the day called for). But just how big a hole was I looking at given our huge disparity in cycling power?
On the last out-and-back section of the bike course, with just a few miles to go, I got my answer. I saw my son ripping toward me, keeping pace with a hard-looking competitor in a college tri kit. We exchanged a delighted low-five, and I hit the split timer on my watch. When I passed that same spot after my own turn-around, I got the answer: seven and a half minutes down.
After deploying my secret weapon again by logging the day’s second-fastest bike to run transition, I dashed out on the course, determined to at least get within shouting distance — and it was here that decades of endurance training paid off.
I passed five or six runners on the first of two loops, but still no sign of Will until, with just under two miles to go, I saw a lean form with a shock of blonde hair striding a hundred yards ahead, as familiar a form to me as my reflection in a mirror.
All the emotions I’d been fearing — competitiveness, doubt, relief — were absent. What I felt when I saw Will was pride, and the sort of love that comes from seeing your child take up something monumentally hard and unfamiliar, and excelling at it. Or to use the current teenage argot, “dominating.”
He was suffering, for sure. But when I eased up to him for a sweaty on-the-run kiss, he was relieved to see me, and still cracking jokes.
“This is the most awful thing I’ve ever done,” he said.
“Yeah,” I replied, “But you’re still ripping. Let’s run it in together.”
We held hands as we ran for a while, his feeling huge and unfamiliar in mine. We shared some water and a banana. We talked about how to tackle the course’s last, huge hill and just as he was telling me about a tarantula he had seen on the first loop (I immediately worried he’d been hallucinating), damned if the same gigantic hairy spider didn’t crawl across the road right in front of our feet. We pounded through the last mile while I tried not to cry, finishing strong, and holding hands once again.
The finish was a welter of bodies and confusion, as they always are — a situation compounded by the fact that the Extreme course finishers were interspersed with the day’s Sprint competitors. We tottered on ropy legs over to our bikes to sit down and mull over what we’d just done.
I thought we had done well. Will didn’t know what to think, until I dragged him — with some reluctance — to the timing tent. My wife’s worries now boomed in my head as we bent over Tri California’s laptops and took a peek at the results.
In first place in the Under 16 group: Will Wright. As an afterthought, I checked my results. Third.
A double podium.
But the surprises for the day weren’t over. At the awards ceremony, Terry Davis dropped a bomb: “I’m proud to announce that the winners of each age group have just qualified for the ITU Offroad Triathlon World Championships next April 30th in Extremadura, Spain.”
I looked at Will, stunned. “Dude,” I stammered, “You’re going to Worlds.”
His face was beatific, angelic. He floated through the rest of the morning as we packed up and headed north, falling twitchingly asleep in the car for two hours as his winner’s medal bumped softly on his chest.
Watching him sleep, it was clear that competing against each other was ridiculously not the point. Surfing together was the point. Swimming together was the point. Riding bikes, together, was definitely the point.
So what if Will’s the stronger rider and swimmer? Who cares if I can still run him down? All I knew was that in addition to inheriting his mother’s good looks, Will had inherited a healthy competitive spirit, a love of outdoor play, and a world-class level of triathlon goodness. Now I just had to figure out how to beat his little brother in skateboarding…
Epilogue:
Three days after his race, Gordon got this email from USA Triathlon:
Dear Athlete,
Congratulations! You are being contacted because you have earned a spot on Team USA for the 2011 ITU Cross (Off-Road) Triathlon World Championships because of your outstanding performance at the 2010 Scott Tinley Adventures. The 2011 ITU World Championships are set to take place April 30, 2011 in Extremadura, Spain. This event will be ITU’s inaugural World Championship in this discipline. You don’t want to miss out!
It turns out that the qualifiers run five deep at the Extreme Off Road Tri, and that there may be another Wright family showdown in 2011!
EDITOR’S NOTE: Let the official race results from Scott Tinley’s Offroad Extreme Triathlon show that Will Wright finished in 3:05:36 and Gordon Wright in 3:05:37 — one second completely inconsequential yet loaded with fatherly love.




